Friday, December 12, 2014

Struggles of adoption


Adoptions are not a simple matter of going to the adoption agency and picking out a child; there are laws, records and background checks to be taken into account. The experiences of adopted children vary from state to state with differing laws concerning open and closed adoptions in each.
According to Lynda Elkins, a legal assistant at Dove and Barton adoption law firm, closed and open adoptions refer to whether or not private information is shared between the birth mother and child.
A closed adoption allows no information to be given to the child other than some background medical history and reasons for the adoption, while an open adoption allows child to communicate with and know information about the birth parent.
For senior mass communication major Frances Parrish, her closed adoption gave her no information about her birth mother other than a brief description of her medical history and why she elected for adoption.
“I have a closed adoption where I have the background of my birth mother for health reasons, and she talks in this background about why she gave me up for adoption, what her medical history was, as extensive as she knew … It’s just for health reasons,” Parrish said.
The medical history Parrish is talking about is not the same as a medical record. It is not official; it is simply based on what the birth mother told the adoption agency.
“It’s best if you say medical history, because you don’t get the exact record. It is all based on what they tell you,” Parrish said.
This makes it difficult for adoptees from closed adoptions to give medical information to doctors.
“I know I have to say when I go to the doctor for the first time and they’re asking me genetic history and stuff like that, I’m always sure to tell them, ‘I’m adopted,’ and then they just say ‘Oh, clean slate.’”
Parrish said her birth mother didn’t know her father, and never contacted him to tell him he had a child.
“She met a man and had a brief encounter for one night only. That’s how they worded it in the background check. It’s kind of funny. And voila, a child was born,” Parrish said.
Before Parrish, she had three other children, one she gave up for adoption and the other two she kept. She then had four children she aborted before getting pregnant with Parrish and electing for adoption.
“I don’t know what made her not want to abort me like all the others, but I’m kinda glad she didn’t. I know she said in her statement she was too proud I guess to ask for any kind of child support. She never had child support I guess to take care of the other guys,” Parrish said.
Parrish said that her adoptive mother did not want her to open her birth mother’s background history until she was 21 because of her mother’s past.
“She wanted me to understand everything because of the nature of my birth. It would be a lot harder for me to take if I were 17, 16, 18, young girl who has never really had a boyfriend, been in love, that sort of stuff. Never experienced that sort of stuff, and you know, being 18 and not understanding. You know, why would you just hook up with one person for one night and then not tell? I wouldn’t understand it. And then, you know, the whole aborted children, all my other brothers, it would have blown my mind,” Parrish said.
The adoption process is not only extensive on adoptive home requirements but it is also costly.
            “It takes a year or two to get approved for adoption. So they had to have like, caseworkers came out to their house, they surveyed the house, they interviewed people. They had to have so many character references from people,” Parrish said.
            According to South Carolina legislation, the adoption process requires a fee to the adoptive parents for reimbursement of the temporary guardian, investigation fees to make sure the parents are fit to have the child, a separate fee just for the adoption, attorney fees and child-placement agency fees.
            “They had to have bank statements, like how much income they had. Stuff about their grandparents, what their family and friends were like, was the house baby-proof, was the house baby-safe, that sort of thing,” Parrish said.
According to Parrish, her birth mother is not her mother.
“To me your real parent is the person who takes care of you, so I don’t say, ‘my adoptive parents,’ I say ‘my parents’ because they are my parents. They took care of me; they raised me. And then the lady who birthed me is just the birth mother, the lady who birthed me — nothing else.”
             Parrish said when she was a child other children were amazed that she was adopted.
            I can remember being 8 years old at school talking to people, like talking to kids about it. But they thought I was so cool. They were like, ‘I don’t understand,’ and I was trying to explain it to them, how it all worked, it was really funny. I can just remember sitting at the lunch table,” Parrish said.
            The older she gets the more adopted people she meets. Parrish said some people are acquaintances and there are others she’s gotten to know.
            “There’s more of us than you think. Some of us are clearly visible, like kids adopted from Korea or China into American families, and then there’s, you know, us American adoptees. We look just like our adoptive parents, or real parents, whatever you want to call them,” Parrish said.

Friday, October 31, 2014

Louisiana senate race shows struggles of women candidates

Louisiana’s senate race is coming to a close finish as Democratic candidate Mary Landrieu and Republican candidate Bill Cassidy face off in a last-minute dash for undecided and minority voters.
The senate stands at a ratio of 80 men to 20 women, and Landrieu’s win or defeat will affect the proportion of women with seats. 

The race between Cassidy and Landrieu is expected to go in a run-off Nov. 4 with neither candidate at the required 50 percent votes needed to win in the polls. 

Landrieu, who has held the Louisiana senate seat since 1996, has based her campaign on making sure President Barack Obama keeps his word on implementing the Affordable Care Act. Alternatively, Cassidy has based his campaign against the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare), and promises to vote for repealing the act.

Landrieu faces a different set of struggles as a woman candidate than male candidates.

According to political science professor Dr. Scott Huffmon, women have a harder time running for public office than men.

“Whenever they’re running for public office, women get a very different kind of scrutiny,” Huffmon said. “We still have the phenomenon where a man wearing a gray suit absolutely makes no news but a woman wearing a pant suit of a color the writer doesn’t like may make news.”

Landrieu must change views toward her leadership role into a positive light in order to seal votes amongst citizens who lean negatively toward women in leadership positions.

“Women in powerful positions tend to be accused of being, I think the new modern term people are going with, is bossy. Whereas for men it’s seen as a leadership plus. So women face an entirely different set of standards for what it means to be a good leader, and it’s tough,” Huffmon said.

In a forum for women in senate, American Party candidate Jill Bossi running for South Carolina said, “Women have to learn to be bolder, they have to learn to be bossy, they have to learn to be confident in their skills and abilities, and when the opportunity comes, they have to be willing to stand up and say ‘I’ll do it.’”

Democratic candidate Joyce Dickerson said that running for senate in a “good old boys’ system” has been a challenge.

According to Huffmon, Landrieu has used her leadership role in the past as a selling point. Particularly in reference to natural disasters, such as Katrina, Landrieu points out her past in the senate as a plus, stating that she has experience.

Landrieu has said that being a woman running for senate in the south has been even harder.

Landrieu said in an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, “The south has not always been the friendliest place for African-Americans, it’s been a difficult time for the president to present himself in a very positive light as a leader. It’s not always been a good place for women to be able to present ourselves. It’s more of a conservative place. So we’ve had to work a little bit harder on that.”

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Louise Pettus Archives provides gallery, event for 50th anniversary of integration

Dr. Cynthia Plair Roddey, one of the first African-American students, spoke about her experiences at Winthrop during the event that acting president Dr. Debra Boyd spoke at.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Rock Hill's most violent crimes

            Over the years, several cases have stood out amongst others as national news sites spread the stories of Rock Hill’s most violent crimes.
            The story of a young man who killed his parents Thanksgiving week in 1997 in Rock Hill over inheritance money has gained widespread attention and has also been published as a book. James Robertson was sentenced to death row after he was convicted for murdering both his parents in a gruesome series of events.
James Robertson in court, 2007.
Photo courtesy of the Rock Hill Herald
            “James Robertson came from a really good family, he came from a neighborhood in Celanese and India Hook; an upper middleclass family. He had issues; he didn’t make it in college and couldn’t find a job,” said Captain Mike Bollinger, who was on the Rock Hill police force at the time.
            Robertson’s parents very well off. According to the Herald, Robertson was constantly showered with money and gifts from his parents, despite dropping out of college and being unable to find a job.
            Robertson brutally murdered first his mother, slicing her with a butcher knife and beating her with a hammer. He then proceeded to blind his father with Tilex cleaner and bash him in the head with both a hammer and baseball bat.
            According to Bollinger, Robertson committed a double parricide for their $2.2 million inheritance.
            Robertson was convicted in 1999 but has been sitting on death row appealing his sentence to the Supreme Court. His story can be found across the Web on sites such as Murderpedia and Wikipedia.
            More recently, a sexual assault on a young girl in 2001 rocked the community when her father, who many believe is innocent, was convicted.
            Billy Wayne Cope’s daughter was asleep in her room one night when, according to Cope, he awoke suddenly at 3 a.m., feeling that something was not right. His wife was out working third shift cleaning an office and it was just him and the girls at home.
            Cope checked in on two of his three sleeping daughters, noticing that his oldest daughter’s door was shut. He went back to sleep, troubled.
            At 6 a.m. Cope knew something was wrong. His eldest daughter, Amanda, did not get up and was not answering his calls. Cope attempted to open her bedroom door, but found it caught on something and unable to move. He then grew worried and burst through the door, only to find his daughter, sexually assaulted, bruised and lifeless, on her bed. He called the police, and in a very calm, docile tone, told them his daughter was dead.
            This is Cope’s version of the story.
            According to police reports, there was no sign of forced entry into the house. There was only one conclusion—Cope molested and murdered his 12-year-old daughter.
            Cope admitted four times to committing the crime, but only after he declared over 600 times that he was innocent. Cope’s lawyer, Jim Morton, claimed that Cope had been worn down over hours of questions and threats of a death sentence.
Billy Wayne Cope in court, 2003.
Photo courtesy of The New York Times.
            Morton also claimed that police made mistakes by not checking the scene of the crime closely, and more importantly, not releasing the DNA they found on Amanda’s body, which did not belong to Cope, but another man.
            With the confessions, lack of forced entry and evidence against him, Cope was convicted of assisting in the sexual assault and murder of his daughter.
            He has since appealed to the Supreme Court for another trial, while his prosecutor, Kevin Brackett, has created a website for the sole intention of exposing Cope as guilty.
            The controversy is large and nationwide, with articles from Dateline, The Daily Beast and The New York Times dissecting and discussing the possibility of his guilt and innocence. 
            NBC Dateline has a segment they showed on air and an article on their website outlining the situation.
            According to Winthrop Chief of Police Frank Zebedis, these are only a couple of several crimes Rock Hill has seen affect the community and reach national news media. The others being the rape and murder of resident Melinda Snyder and the execution of police officer James “Brent” McCants, who was attempting to retreat to his vehicle when two men shot him in the back and then in the head.
            On McCants, Zebedis said, “While he tried to retreat to his vehicle, the suspects continued to shoot him in the back.  They went over to his lifeless body, retrieved his duty weapon and executed him by shooting him in the back of the head.  They stole his duty weapon and radio.”
            "Brent’s funeral service was one of the saddest things I ever witnessed.  This event had a personal impact on me and my family because of the relationship I had with him.  Brent would come to my house during our patrol shift and my wife would make us dinner and he would play with my children,” Zebedis said.
            The Rock Hill community was deeply affected by his murder, and dedicated a memorial to him on Dave Lyle Boulevard in Manchester Meadows.

            These crimes have not only affected the Rock Hill Police and residents, but also the nation as these stories are scattered across media for all to read and see.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Walk Around Winthrop


View Walking Around Winthrop in a larger map

Fitting in at College

  1. Attend the first week events!! This will make it much easier to meet new people and bond with your peers.
  2. Meet friends as SOON as possible. It is much more difficult making friends after everyone has already met and decided who they will spend their time with.
  3. Know the campus - walk around. This is something that will come with time, but is much better to know starting off.
  4. Become involved in groups that relate to you. This will fill your time and make you feel welcome on campus.
  5. Make yourself at home!